| RANK | COMPANY | Patent Capital (PC) | RATING |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qualcomm United States | $ 2,093,338,235 | AAA |
| 2 | Apple United States | $ 1,230,332,210 | AAA |
| 3 | Micron Technology United States | $ 1,221,308,463 | AAA |
| 4 | Japan Display Japan | $ 970,463,420 | AAA |
| 5 | Kioxia Holdings Japan | $ 750,008,139 | AAA |
| 6 | Canon Japan | $ 742,249,429 | AAA |
| 7 | Sharp Japan | $ 660,106,133 | AAA |
| 8 | Intel United States | $ 592,014,623 | AAA |
| 9 | Murata Manufacturing Japan | $ 521,489,848 | AAA |
| 10 | Seiko Epson Japan | $ 468,020,916 | AAA |
| 11 | Renesas Electronics Japan | $ 375,735,012 | AAA |
| 12 | Mitsubishi Electric Japan | $ 374,039,165 | AAA |
| 13 | International Business Machines United States | $ 350,863,526 | AAA |
| 14 | Kyocera Japan | $ 290,061,022 | AA |
| 15 | Texas Instruments United States | $ 262,479,697 | AA |
| 16 | Microsoft United States | $ 234,811,177 | AA |
| 17 | Panasonic Holdings Japan | $ 230,558,793 | AA |
| 18 | Sony Group Japan | $ 215,201,062 | AA |
| 19 | Rohm Japan | $ 197,358,676 | AA |
| 20 | Denso Japan | $ 194,885,345 | AA |
| 21 | NXP Semiconductors Netherlands | $ 186,744,102 | AA |
| 22 | Alphabet A United States | $ 175,562,469 | AA |
| 23 | Fuji Electric Japan | $ 175,183,191 | AA |
| 24 | NEC Japan | $ 164,431,522 | AA |
| 25 | Toyota Jidosha | $ 158,255,355 | AA |
| 26 | Tokyo Electron Japan | $ 157,274,887 | AA |
| 27 | TDK Japan | $ 156,504,572 | AA |
| 28 | Dell Technologies United States | $ 136,412,527 | AA |
| 29 | Dainippon Printing | $ 133,439,558 | AA |
| 30 | $ 125,341,849 | AA |
What we do
We leverage our Infringement Database to provide game-changing data and advisory to a wide range of clients, including global corporations and top-tier law firms, activist hedge funds, PE/VC firms, legal funding platforms, and other financial services providers. Our data has been used to support trading, investment, patent monetization, and due diligence strategies. Put simply: We generate patent insights you can take to the bank.
Rating Methodology
Our methodology for evaluating and pricing patents is based on two key dimensions: the likelihood of infringement of the patent (technical analysis) and the relative market impact of the potentially infringing product (commercial analysis). This approach enables patent holders, investors and legal professionals, for the first time ever, to obtain patent value estimations using structured data and transparent mathematical functions.